Are you looking for the best intraoral scanners to enhance your dental practice? With so many options available from Chinese manufacturers, choosing the right one can be overwhelming. Let’s dive into a comparison of the top intraoral scanner factories in China to help you make an informed decision for your clinic’s needs. Here’s a breakdown of the key features, pros, and cons of each leading brand.

Top Dental Intraoral Scanner Comparison 2021

Intraoral Scanner Reviews from IDS 2021 + Market Overview

Product Details: The PANDA Smart Intraoral Scanner is a lightweight and compact device, weighing 138 grams and made of metal. It features simple USB 3.0 connectivity and is used for various dental indications such as crown and bridge scanning, scanning edentulous areas, and implant scanning. The scanner also includes innovative AI features, a mobile app, and free cloud services.

Pros:
– Lightweight and compact design, similar in size to a toothbrush
– High-quality metal build
– Simple USB 3.0 connectivity
– Innovative AI features
– Mobile app integration and free cloud services

Cons:
– Dated scanning software
– Occasional issues with texture placement, such as gingival color texture on teet…
– Software needs improvement for better detail and accuracy

Find the Best Intraoral Scanner Reviews 2024

Product Details: The Medit i700 intraoral scanner is a high-performance device known for its speed, ease of use, and advanced features. It boasts a scanning speed that allows full-arch scans in under 40 seconds, with the fastest scan recorded at 18 seconds. The scanner uses structured light technology and is equipped with a touch screen, wireless capability, and caries detection. It integrates with various software apps, including smile design and ortho simulation, and relies on third-party CAD/CAM software. The scanner has autoclavable tips that can be used up to 100 times and does not require subscription fees, although cloud storage has a

monthly fee after a 1 GB limit[4].

Pros:
– Blazingly fast scanning speed, with full-arch scans possible in under 40 seconds
– Easy to use with a simple scanning protocol
– High-definition color scans with excellent image quality after post-processing
– Segmental scanning function that stitches images together efficiently
– No subscription requirements, though cloud storage has a fee after 1 GB
– Autoclavable tips for improved hygiene and safety
– Integrates well with various software apps, including smile design and ortho sim…

Cons:
– The segmental scanning function may affect accuracy in certain indications
– Initial scanning images can appear grainy and low-quality before post-processing
– Relies on third-party CAD/CAM software which might add complexity

A Comparison of Full Arch Trueness and Precision of Nine …

Product Details: The article discusses the development and evaluation of a novel, point-of-care, rapid diagnostic test for COVID-19. The test is based on a lateral flow assay that detects the SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid protein. It is designed to be user-friendly, requiring minimal training, and provides results within 15-20 minutes. The test was evaluated for its sensitivity, specificity, and usability in various clinical settings.

Pros:
– High sensitivity and specificity in detecting SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid protein
– Rapid results within 15-20 minutes
– User-friendly design requiring minimal training
– Suitable for point-of-care use in various clinical settings

Cons:
– Potential for false negatives, especially in early stages of infection or in asy…
– Limited by the availability and quality of the nucleocapsid protein antigen
– May require further validation in diverse populations and settings

Intraoral Scanner Comparison

Aoralscan 3 Intraoral Scanner Review | the latest IOS by …

Comparison of Accuracy of Current Ten Intraoral Scanners

Product Details: The study compares the accuracy of 10 intraoral scanners developed from 2015 to 2020. The scanners include Trios 3 and Trios 4 (3Shape Trios A/S, Copenhagen, Denmark), iTero Element, iTero 2, and iTero 5D Element (Align Technologies, San Jose, California, USA), Dental Wings (Dental Wings, Montreal QC, Canada), Panda 2 (Pengtum Technologies, Shanghai, China), Medit i500 (Medit Corp. Seoul, South Korea), Planmeca Emerald™ (Planmeca, Helsinki, Finland), and Aoralscan (Shining 3D Tech. Co., Ltd., Hangzhou, China). A maxillary dental model with reference points was scanned five times with each scanner, and the 3D scanned stereolithography files were analyzed using SPSS 18

and Rhinoceros software.

Pros:
– High precision among all scanners, with favorable consistency in repeated scans.
– Trios series showed the best scan results compared to other scanners in terms of…
– Scanners provide accurate 3D models, which are crucial for patient diagnosis, op…

Cons:
– Trueness varied among the scanners, indicating some discrepancies in accuracy.
– Accuracy decreases with increasing distance, affecting the overall precision of…
– Some scanners, like the Medit i500, showed inferior trueness compared to others…

6 Best Digital Intraoral Scanners for Your Dental Practice

Product Details: Intraoral scanners are advanced dental tools that create digital impressions of a patient’s teeth and mouth. They come with various features such as multiple scan head sizes, double-sided buttons for easy handling, long battery life, and advanced image sensors for high accuracy. These scanners also offer lossless image compression and do not require calibration.

Pros:
– Improved accuracy of digital impressions
– Faster and more efficient impression-taking process
– Comfortable and non-invasive experience for patients
– Sustainable and eco-friendly by eliminating messy impression materials
– High precision suitable for detailed restorative and orthodontic work
– Fast scanning capabilities enhance workflow efficiency
– Seamless integration with CAD/CAM systems and laboratories
– Simplified infection control and more hygienic method

Cons:
– Expensive investment to purchase and maintain
– Limited acceptance by some dental laboratories
– Learning curve required to understand and use the technology
– Higher initial cost and ongoing maintenance and training needs
– Subscription fees for software updates and cloud storage
– Potential bulkiness compared to newer models
– Limited integration with some CAD/CAM systems

Comparison of Accuracy of Current Ten Intraoral Scanners

Product Details: Intraoral scanners are devices used to create digital impressions of a patient’s teeth and mouth. They vary in accuracy, speed, and functionality. For example, the Trios 3Shape is noted for its high accuracy in single-tooth scanning, while the Carestream CS 3600 excels in inter-arch diameter performance[1][5].

Pros:
– Improved accuracy of digital impressions compared to traditional methods, result…
– Faster and more efficient impression-taking process, saving time for both dentis…
– More comfortable and non-invasive experience for patients, especially those with…
– Sustainable and eco-friendly, eliminating the need for messy and chemically harm…
– Shorter mean scan times, particularly with Carestream CS 3600 and Trios 3Shape[1…

Cons:
– Expensive investment to purchase and maintain the technology, which can be a sig…
– Limited acceptance by dental laboratories, requiring additional coordination for…
– Learning curve required to understand and use the technology effectively, which…

Comparison of Accuracy of Current Ten Intraoral Scanners

Product Details: This study compared the accuracy of 10 intraoral scanners developed from 2015 to 2020. The scanners included Trios 3 and Trios 4 (both in normal and high-resolution mode), iTero Element, iTero 2, iTero 5D Element, Dental Wings, Panda 2, Medit i500, Planmeca Emerald™, and Aoralscan. A maxillary dental model with reference points was scanned five times with each scanner. The 3D scanned stereolithography files were analyzed for trueness and precision using a vernier caliper and Rhinoceros software.

Pros:
– The Trios series showed the best scan results compared to other scanners.
– The intraoral scanners demonstrated favorable precision in repeated scans.
– Scanning time was significantly reduced, especially with the Trios system, which…

Cons:
– The accuracy of the scanners decreased with increasing distance, particularly in…
– Scanners had varying trueness, with some showing significant deviations from the…
– Recording the finishing lines of preparations with deep gingival margins remaine…

Comparison Table

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

What are the key factors to consider when choosing an intraoral scanner from Chinese manufacturers?

When selecting an intraoral scanner from Chinese manufacturers, you should consider several key factors. These include the accuracy and precision of the scanner, its scanning speed, and how well it integrates with your existing dental practice systems. Additionally, think about the cost, including the initial purchase price, any subscription fees, and ongoing maintenance expenses. The size and ergonomics of the scanner, as well as the quality of customer support, are also important.

How do Chinese intraoral scanners compare in terms of price and quality to international brands?

Chinese intraoral scanners have made significant strides in recent years, offering high-quality imaging technology at a more competitive price point compared to international brands. While some may still perceive Chinese products as being of lower quality, many manufacturers have invested in research and development to produce reliable and efficient scanners. Chinese scanners can be significantly cheaper, making them more accessible to smaller dental practices, but they often match or come close to the quality of more expensive international brands.

What certifications and regulations do Chinese intraoral scanners need to comply with?

In China, intraoral scanners must comply with regulations set by the China Food and Drug Administration (CFDA) and the National Medical Products Administration (NMPA). Manufacturers need to obtain a medical device registration certificate and adhere to the Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP) standards. They must also comply with industry standards such as the YY/T 0287-2017 “Technical requirements for intraoral scanner,” which specifies performance, safety, and quality requirements.

How do the features of Chinese intraoral scanners, such as the BLZ INO100, compare to other models on the market?

The BLZ INO100, a Chinese intraoral scanner, is known for being cost-effective and full-featured. It offers many of the functions available in more expensive scanners but at a lower price. However, it is slightly larger than some other models due to its complex structure designed to ensure accuracy and performance. This scanner is a good option for individual clinics looking for a balance between quality and affordability.

What ongoing costs and maintenance requirements should you expect with Chinese intraoral scanners?

In addition to the initial purchase price, you should consider ongoing costs such as subscription fees for software updates, cloud storage, and regular maintenance. Some Chinese intraoral scanners may require periodic updates and maintenance to ensure optimal performance. It’s also important to factor in the cost of any necessary accessories and the potential need for training or support services. These costs can vary depending on the specific model and manufacturer.